For a start, the battery in the M262 was a lot bigger than that in the M9. The device is dustproof and water-resistant. Epson RD1 style I loved my RD1! The type of viewfinder that the camera has. So, the obvious question: why not the M10-D? A higher megapixel count means that the camera is capable of capturing more details. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_12',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); As it turned out, I would find more advantages with the Leica M262 when I got it. This really piqued my interest. I think, at least, Ive not tried one either . Heres some photos: Bear in mind, these have been taken with a load of different lenses:if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-leader-3','ezslot_21',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-3-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-leader-2','ezslot_20',190,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-2-0'); In conclusion, the Leica M262 is a fantastic camera with a great interface with very few issues worth picking holes in. what a great text, and great pictures, thank you! The LEICA M typ 240 offers a much quieter shutter than the M9, as well as LEICA's first option for an external electronic viewfinder (EVF), the . More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. I didnt really need the better low light performance that the M262 offered, and was quite happy with the speed and output from the often lauded CCD sensor in the M9. No more out of focus shots. When using the M10 in aperture priority mode I dial the EV down to -0.7. Im an auto-ISO guy so the dial is nice for the little I use it. Early M3 models featured a double-stroke lever, meaning it required two strokes to advance to the next frame of film and cock the shutter. After the M11 released though, used prices of the M10 dropped and I decided to get one. I wont go into too much more detail now, but for saying that unlike the M240 and M262 that Ive otherwise used since the M9, the Leica M10-P really feels like it has []. These were live-view using the screen on the back or a slot in electronic viewfinder and video. If you arent aware of these lenses, they focus down to about 40cm. The image quality of the Leica M240 is outstanding. The camera becomes entirely unresponsive. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come. Thanks, James. The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! He mentioned that he drives older vehicles in order to be able to afford just the kit he wants.Agreed with John Smith. Can you compare side by side, please? Ultimately I hope that the dial on the M10 will give me a greater sense of being in control and connected to the ISO settings Im using. Some cards are woefully slow. Functionalism be damned. Controls feel well balanced and satisfyingly precise. Of course Im now retired and not doing imaging for a living. So the M262 is going to stay, and the Leica M240 go. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. Yet all the buttons on it and the LCD still have me pining for Leicas. Can you let me know where you heard that the sensor uses different technology? Ill have to dig out an online manual , I got an 262 you have to press SET after choosing- only with 3 button possiblewith latest software (2021). We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. I appreciate your thoughts on the 262 v the 240 as I am thinking about setting an MD body. Upload or insert images from URL. Ive tried all of the digital M types and my heartfelt favorites are the M8 and M9-P (equally), then the Typ 262 in that order. But, when my M262 needed to go to German camera hospital for what I guessed might be a significant amount of time (as is often the case), I figured I had little to loose trying out an M240 for a few weeks/months. . As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? As I talk about in my M9 review, the screen on that camera really is very crap, so this did feel like a big enough deal to make the jump. For example, I am in a coffee shop with the camera sitting on a Manfrotto table top tripod. By Exphotog, A Love Affair With The Leica M-D 262 by Ong Sien Hong - 35mmc, Initial experiments with a Leica M10-P and a Nikon 35mm 2.8 PC Shift Lens - 35mmc, (Mis)adventures with a Minolta Himatic 7s - By Matt Evans, 5 Frames with the new Voigtlander Color-Skopar Vintage Line 21mm f/3.5 By John Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. That alone justifies the decision to buy. This was a heretical change from earlier Leicas. Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. Paste as plain text instead, Another M10 fetish is better performance at high ISO. Posted December 28, 2020 (edited) A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. I know this is an old article but so what, I m commenting anyways. While I am relatively new to the Leica world, I have done the exact same thing as you: I am selling my M262 (although not for another digital M!). That breaks the rules by my measure, unfortunately . First you have to press the ISO button, then use the thumb dial to scroll to the ISO you want, then finally either press SET or the INFO button to lock it in. Best wishes to you all and thanks again for your help. Its just become a reason not to use the screen as much as I might have. I took the M240 because it offeres live view. It happened with the M8,M9, more recently the M240 and now the M262. Paste as plain text instead, It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M rangefinder, and the first to use a CMOS type sensor. Unfortunately, my business partner has also vetoed the idea of me selling both M240 and M262 to buy an M10. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. Though I prefer using Rolleiflex and an old M4 for my creative projects. I had recently bought a Nikon 50mm f/2 LTM lens and had mounted it on the M240. From what I gather, skin tones have better rendering with the M10. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience. The image on the back screen of the Leica M240 is very cool toned and unsaturated. The Leica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than the M Typ 240. The new Leica M is the most innovative and versatile M-Camera that the modern M-System has ever created. I currently own a 262. Leica M9 vs. M240; M240: More Thoughts; Leica M240: Final Verdict; Leica M9 sharpness vs. Sony RX1R, Nikon D800E, Fuji X100s; My camera of the year for 2013; Related. The even newer M-P Typ 240 purchase just opens up addtional opportunities of using a digital M as a multi-purpose tool. One review even suggested that the M10 should be called the M11, with the M240 rightfully being the M10. I have gotten perfectly good images with the M-240 at ISO 2000 and at 3200 the images are still manageable with a small amount of noise reduction in LR. That said, I do miss the live view feature. Thank you for it. That said, I dont shoot Leicas for rapidity.Start Up. Great article as always! To seethedifference between Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 cameras we have put together Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 specs comparison tablebelow. So I am very glad I got the 240 version. Both are great cameras and either would be fine. I too prefer the more stripped back feature set of the M9, M240, and M10. without having to transfer the images to the computer first. The Leica M240 has done me proud whilst the M262 has been away, though the experience has not be without a couple of surprises, so I thought Id write a little bit about what Ive found.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_9',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); First off, I should probably say that this isnt going to be a proper review Ive written so many reviews about Leica rangefinder cameras and their subtle differences that the idea of writing my thoughts about every facet of this camera just doesnt appeal at all and thats despite this one having more to offer than any that Ive shot before. With its excellent dynamic range, beautiful colors, and compact design, it won a lot of fans, but perhaps not . I think either will be a fine way into a Leica. I decided that I wanted to keep the one camera that can do close to everything I need in the digital world (and for me, this includes personal and occasional professional work, mostly product still photography, but also videography). Ultra-niche appeal. The latter requires the lens to have 6-bit coding or manual setting of the lens in the main menu. Well worth seeking out. It was the same shape as the M262 I was used to, maybe a touch heavier, but not really noticeably in the hand. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason I went for the M262 instead of the M240 when I was looking to replace my M9. JPG Settings can be on the user assignable first screen and from that quickly turn on/off Monochrome. Aluminium body makes is nice and light. Id mounted the lens to my M262 and was pondering how I was going to get used to shooting a 35mm lens again in such a short period []. One is not better or worse than the other, they are just different. M9 is magic, even SOOC jpgs. "MM-P""" Leica M Typ240MM-P Typ240 But even then, its not close to other modern cameras. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. There is no way to see the chosen ISO until the shot is taken and checking it in the image preview dialogue. And thats pushing it. The renderings are quite good as a whole, and this feature is not contained in the M10 which relegates one to only the lens filter option.Card Writing Speed. As such, the Leica M262 is possibly better seen as a sidestep rather than a step forward in the Leica lineup. Just because something new release does not mean the M9 or even the M8 lost theirs. It only having felt right once in 6 months felt wrong. I dont need such features on my Leica rangefinders these are real cameras that I use properly, I dont need live-view with my real cameras! My first experience discovering I like live-view on a rangefinder was had down the pub quite soon after Id bought the Leica M240. I'm in between the m262 bundle or a used 240. I just recently bought a Leica M262, interestingly I read your blog and it actually helped encourage me to buy it. The model omits the Typ 240's live view and video capabilities, and has a much simpler menu structure and one-button access to . I love using that camera but want a digitals instant gratification and ease of image development (Im lazy). The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to . For my abilities and needs, I have a decent collection of film cameras (too many some might say) and an M8 which is surprisingly still better than just good and more than good enough for what I tend to photograph.But I admit to seriously considering the new Q2, That Q2 has excited a lot of people, it seems!Re. Im used to focus peaking from shooting video with the Sony cameras, so it was such a short leap to press the LV button and take photos in a way that felt familiar. I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. Im not going to go into details here to be honest. With the M9, just going out for a day I would take two batteries. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. Additionally, I really like the simplified look and small upgrades the MP versions offer. I wanted an M262 for all the reasons above but found an M-P 240 for a really good price and just turned off all the video and live view. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers what's best described as a stripped-back user interface. M240 v. M246 v. M262 v. Monochrom 246. I love the files the camera produces, the size and weight is just right and operationally it couldnt be much simpler. - 35mmc, https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party, Nikon 28ti and 35ti - Mini-Review - By Ahmed Al Shorouqi, 5 frames with the Nikon FM2 & Agfa APX 400 in my Paris - By Martina Rigotti, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. I have found that the shadows in the M10 can be pulled forever, which is great, because both cameras have about the same capacity to blow highlight details. I can get focus on a defined distance or subject and with a remote release or the self timer, get stealthy images while at the same time getting real time information on exposure. I didnt have the energy to get into the subtleties of all that here though, LV is useful even if the screen does not move. That being said, this is pretty much everything I want from a digital camera or any sort of camera for that matter. But the M9 for me has so many characteristics, beyond specs, iso performance or touchscreen blah blah blah. Youve often been a voice of reason in my ear on this website, John. Given my choice to upgrade to the M10, possibly the most pertinent issue with the ISO settings is the inability to set or see the chosen ISO without pressing a button and looking at the back of the camera. A simple exterior is my kind of camera- adverts belong on billboards, not on cameras. I didn't do any critical tests, but I feel the M262 may have around one stop advantage at high iso. Source: DxOMark. I do use this feature fairly often as an alternative to using a screw in BW filter. Battery power, or battery capacity, represents the amount of electrical energy that a battery can store. (Leica M (Typ 262)) CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. And I like the grainy renderings for some scenes.Live View. When I was looking at replacing my M9 with a newer model which I did in large part for the benefit of a better screen on the back I chose to skip the Leica M240 due to the fact that I didnt feel like the swathe of features it had compared to the later M262 offered me any advantage. We were shooting inside a large carpet manufacturers in Kidderminster and I was trying to get some slightly abstract well timed shots of the various goings on in the factory. The overall user interface of the Leica M262 turned out to be a bigger upgrade than I expected too though its still not been quite the perfect experience. The M240 is a great camera that produces gorgeous images but you are undoubtedly going to love the M10. Your previous content has been restored. Adjusting colours always feels like a headache, but is one Ive broadly avoided with this camera. My biggest problem with the digital M bodies is I cant use my Summicron DR on them (although, havent tested it on an M10 yet). A few more differences - Leica M10 vs Leica M240. I cant. I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. Yes!! Image quality will be essentially the same. High ISO performance a must wish it was even better. And so I had to do a paradoxical thing. Shedding some light on the sources of noise, Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2022, Leica adds 12-bit Cinema 4K Raw video output, improved AF features and more to its SL2-S, A closer look at the Leica M11 (photo gallery), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. I also dont shoot flash and I dont bracket, so really the only part of the set-menu thats of use to me is the ISO settings, and the ISO settings have their own dedicated button. Another M10 fetish. That said, Ive sometimes found that shooting in high contrast situations the exposure prefers to underexpose slightly, yet have always found the shadows to have plenty enough detail in them when pulled out in post. In the setup menu, the most used setting is white balance. We think it rises to the challenge. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. I am sure you have seen the funny Video of Kai Wong:https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, I have indeed, thanks, I shall take another look its been a while!Sounds like youve made a good choice!I have recently picked up a TL to use along side the forthcoming M10 they both use the same Visoflex, Im going to take the charitable route here but Pera Detlics comment may be interpreted as Leicas are expensive and Pera doesnt have the matching skill set to justify buying one.I also feel that way. I hadnt noticed that it focused closer though. Pasted as rich text. BudfoxJuly 7, 2016 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). Sometimes, colours from M262 can be a bit more saturated than from M240, but as I use them only in recording DNG, post work can do what I want. Using the right SD card is key here. Something about the idea that it had all these weird and wonderful features made me expect a camera that felt different. There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. The sensor is still not what I would consider great (or even competitive) in regards to dynamic range and high ISO quality, perhaps I was just spoiled by the incredible capabilities of the Nikon Df. That said, the real joy is in how little even the two screens of options in the main menu need to be used. Flip-out screens can be useful for tricky shots. After a few weeks of using the new Leica M262 I posted a review along with a few videos. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. They've been even used in a documentary made by a friend of mine. Theres a certain robustness or heft to the M240/M262 files that I personally dont see in the M10 files, and that is likely a result of the different sensors used in the cameras. It then required a short trip to camera-hospital in Germany. Thank you for pointing me to that review. Very interesting. Itd be a waste of time when you can go and find other reviews that no doubt do high ISO comparisons with other brands of cameras etc. I have purchased an M262 and, given my budget, a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm (which I have read is actually a really good lens). What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Never came to me idea to compare them side by side, sorry. Clear editor. So I still have ways to go to become a true minimalist! With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones. Although I know right from the gate that my M-P Typ 240 wont get as much use as my new heart winning M9-P, it will however keep me from having that inevitable internal debate of owning just one old or new M body. I currently shoot with a Fuji X-Pro2 and love it. Your previous content has been restored. The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. Find a comparison between different fujifilm x30 vs x100t. Hi everyone. On the M240 its easy to change ISO by simply pressing the dedicated ISO button and turning the thumb adjustment wheel.The EVF. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to add direct access to the white balance feature. When the Leica M262 was released, Leica proudly told the world that the menu had been reduced to two screens worth of features. If live view/video is a don't care then buy the lower cost camera. (Leica M Typ 240), Nikon D850 + Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS, Sony a6600 + Sony E 18-135mm F3__5-5__6 OSS, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 28-70mm f/3__5-5__6 OSS, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM. Leaving aside the video recording, the main difference is the simplified menu of the 262 v the live view of the 240. I dont need to get excited by them dont get me wrong, theres fun in a camera that provides some sort of novelty initially, but longer-term I just need my cameras to work in a way that suits me. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. My M8 is still around for those who are wondering. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. The M240 is wide and bulky. In short, getting two cameras- a classic and a modern type, solves the damnable inadequacy issue that arises in all of us when you own just one type. The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain situations. It seemed it was not much larger than an M7; that, alone, was enough to make me decide I would own one someday. Ive spent the last month or so shooting with a Leica M [typ 240]. Phase-detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus, allowing for sharper images. (and more M ) when I look at results, there is no difference as they share same sensor. Leica M Typ 240. From what I understand the M10 has substantially improved this feature and this is an attractive change. Which despite it feeling like something that would really suit me as someone who prefers to operate without the need for any sort of menu driven interface on their cameras was still a fairly small feature for quite a lot more cash!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); As such I bought an M262 and fairly happily got on with shooting it for the best part of a year. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. They take on a garish orange tint that is hard to process in LR. It has two memory card slots, allowing you to store more photos without switching cards. A personal taste thing of course, but youd think that a Leica camera would have a screen that was at least mostly accurate to the end photo? I was even contemplating selling my Leica lenses and the M3 as well, but I love using that film M system (and film photography) so much that I could not do it (at least not yet)! Thanks!These new Nikons look fairly amazing I do wish theyd been quicker to market though!M10 review I guess it depends on how much it inspires a post out of me its the first new Leica Digital camera Ive ever bought, and with it being new/current, I might try and squeeze something out sooner rather than later. If you like aluminium choose the M262, if you prefer brass go for the M240. You mirror my sentiments about the camera to a t! I have had good luck with Sonys latest fast SD cards, improving this condition quite well. With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. Quick charge with automatic constant current control prevents battery from overcharging, short circuit, and electronic shock However, the megapixel count is not the only important element determining the quality of an image. Good thing, I don't need to upgrade further, as those are plenty enough for many years to come. Nice write-up. Usability is great (with some of the limitations you mentioned), and image quality of the 262 is certainly superb, and the main reason (aside from usability and a good sensor), at least for me, the Leica M glass, is a topic somebody else can cover much better than I can. Has a built-in focus motor Leica M (Typ 262) Hello. Yura, I still use both with other M along. Anyway, Im firmly off topic at this point, but almost two years on and I have no gripes at all with the M10. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didn't need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. Plus it's lighter. but it really did sound like something was missing inside compared to the 240. The big round dial on the back of the M9 was always tricky to use. We were perfectly happy in the film days when KODAK or FUJI(film) updated our sensor with a new emulsion. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Thanks a lot for all your helpful comments. Im really glad I ordered it, the best Leica M camera Ive ever used! CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. Be the first. To me this feels ever so slightly clunky as its also continued to catch me out over the time Ive used the camera. Since most reviews are quite large in content thanks to extensive coverage, comparisons to other cameras and large sample images, they span across multiple pages for easier reading experience. This has become a bit of a trend now, I buy a digital Leica, shoot with it for a while, decide to sell it for one reason or another, and then scramble to write about it in the final few days of owning it. I remember initially thinking that the colours coming out of the M10 files seemed thin when compared to those of the M240 and the photos in your review of the M262 have reminded me of that. Leica m240 sony a7sii . You can post now and register later. I cant keep it my business partner has vetoed that idea. I find the M262 colours different enough from the M-P I just sold - to my eye the blues, reds, aquas and purples feel denser. Great pictures and very interesting. It is great way to capture things like the setting sun, or clouds moving across the sky. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Overall, these changes made the move from the M9 to M262 feel greater than the sum of their parts. Then along comes the M262, digital Leica I'd been waiting for. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. This made me think; maybe I could get on with the video features too? p.s. Now, Im writing this after my M262 has come back from Germany (it only took a couple of months!! I then had a feeling that Im sure a lot of people who have too many cameras have once in a while You might know it yourself? But nope, they included a hardly useful flourish, that as you say, looks like it was thought up but a marketing department. Leica has issued new, updated firmware for the entire range of Leica M10 and M240-generation cameras. !if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_13',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); One way or another, in the time Ive been using the camera, Ive not got used to this little issue, though I have at least learned to live with it. All the added features that the M240 brought to the table didnt really appeal to me, and specifically because I didnt think I was interested in live view, I felt that all the M10 could offer me was an ISO dial. Im not sure about the iso dial though, I feel like thats a feature that would really suit me. Finally, a digital camera that truly feels like a good old analog Leica. As is the image quality of the M10.